More of the Same? Women and the Scottish Local Government Elections 2012


By Dr. Meryl Kenny (UNSW) and Dr. Fiona Mackay (Edinburgh)

Thirteen years after devolution heralded a ‘new dawn’ in women’s representation – with Nordic levels of women MSPs elected to the first Scottish Parliament – the story remains very different at local government level. Less than 1 in 4 candidates for next month’s local government elections are women, leaving the face of local politics looking decidedly ‘male, pale, and stale’[1]. 1 in 7 council wards is contested by men only. Whilst all-women shortlists have attracted controversy both North and South of the border, the continuation of these all-male shortlists and contests largely goes unnoticed. With local government in crisis around perceived problems of legitimacy, representativeness and quality, this raises questions as to the lessons learned, future prospects, and actions needed if there is to be any real progress on women’s representation in Scotland. We argue that the time has come for tough action on women’s representation, or nothing is going to change anytime soon.

What are the lessons learned from the Scottish Parliament’s success? First, change doesn’t happen on its own. The high numbers of women elected to the Scottish Parliament were not the result of luck or ‘trickle up’ or natural evolution, but were achieved through sustained campaigning and bold party action. In short, gender quotas work. But the puzzle remains: why haven’t quotas ‘caught on’ elsewhere in the political system? Currently, the Scottish Parliament has 45 women MSPs (34.8%), compared with only 22% of Scottish MPs, 17% Scottish MEPs, and 21.6% of Scottish local councillors. Of particular note are trends at the local level, where the percentage of women councillors has flat-lined over the past four elections, hovering around 22% overall.

Change can happen when there’s a shake up of the system. Reformers had high hopes that the introduction of a PR-STV electoral system in local government in the run-up to the 2007 elections would rejuvenate local politics and provide new opportunities for women to be selected and elected. However, progress did not materialize, instead depressingly, it was more of the same. In fact, there was a marked drop in the number of women candidates selected and a small decrease in the number of women councillors elected.

What are the prospects, then, for the local government elections in 2012? Supporters of STV, such as the Electoral Reform Society (ERS), had hoped that the unrealized progressive promise of STV would materialize in the second elections, once the new system had bedded down. The candidate lists have now been released, and our initial analysis of the raw figures shows that the numbers are virtually unchanged from 2007. None of the parties, with the exception of the Scottish Greens, have implemented effective equality measures. This suggests that the number of women likely to take up seats in local councils across Scotland will either stall or fall in 2012.  Ethnic minority candidate breakdowns are not yet available, but the evidence suggests these numbers also will be low.

Some headline figures:

  • Women are 584 of 2497 total candidates (23.4%, compared to 22.5% in 2007 and 27.7% in 2003).
  • Women are 94 out of 362 Conservative candidates (25.9%).
  • Women are 136 out of 497 Labour candidates (27.7%).
  • Women are 69 out of 247 Liberal Democrat candidates (27.4%).
  • Women are 147 out of 614 SNP candidates (23.9%).
  • Women are 35 out of 86 Green candidates (40.7%).
  • Women are 103 out of 691 Independent/Other candidates (14.9%).
  • 56 out of 353 wards (15.9%) have no women candidates standing for election.
  • 10 out of 32 local authority areas have 20% or fewer female candidates standing.
  • The best local authorities in terms of women candidates are Clackmannanshire (36.7%) and Angus (34%), although the current proportion of women councillors in each authority is substantially lower (22.2% and 27.6% respectively).
  • Inverclyde, currently an all-male council, has only one woman standing (Vaughan Jones, Labour) out of 38 total candidates (2.6%).
  • In Glasgow City, where the SNP hope to sweep the board after Labour’s internal strife, 2 out of 3 SNP slates are male only. This suggests that they aren’t prepared to ‘risk’ women in target wards.

What actions are needed? Well, STV isn’t the answer – at least, not on its own. STV was sold as ‘good for women’ and a step forward from first-past-the-post (FPTP), in terms of opening up voter choice. In 2007, the ERS heralded the introduction of STV as a ‘small step’ that would ‘lead to a giant leap in democracy for local government.’[2] The ERS has consistently argued that STV opens up more opportunities for small parties and Independents, which may benefit women, and that multi-member wards encourage parties to run gender-balanced and more ethnically diverse tickets.

There is little international evidence to support this optimistic view. While some commentators see STV as largely gender-neutral, others suggest that STV can be disadvantageous, especially when operating with smaller size wards, as is the case in Scotland. Indeed, none of the relatively few countries that use STV can be said to be ‘trailblazers’ on women’s representation. For example, a smaller proportion of women are returned under STV to the Irish Dáil (15%) than under FPTP to the Westminster House of Commons (22%).

We are sceptical that a system that facilitates the rise of Independent candidates provides an opportunity for women, as the ERS suggests. STV advantages individual candidates with access to time, money and political networks, most of whom tend to be men. Our figures bear out our concerns, as around 85% of all Independent and small party local government candidates in 2012 are men. International research also suggests that parties are less likely to run gender-balanced tickets in small-size wards (3-5 seats), than they are in larger wards (5-7+ seats) where they are more likely to pick up multiple seats[3].

Experience to date suggests parties – rather than electoral systems – are the key factors in promoting women’s political representation. The barriers to women’s access to political office are well-documented, and there are a range of measures that parties can take to counteract these obstacles. If Scotland is to make further headway, parties need to demonstrate that they are serious about changing the face of Scottish politics and also take determined action by introducing and implementing effective equality measures at local level. Lessons can be learned from the Scottish Greens, who are running 40.7% female candidates, who are fairly placed in winnable seats. The party has gender balance mechanisms that are triggered if the percentage of female or male candidates drops below 40%, or where the distribution of winnable seats looks unequal. The prospect of central intervention means that local selectors keep these equality criteria to the front of their minds when selecting candidates, according to the Green Party. This mechanism did not need to be triggered in 2012, suggesting that a general culture of gender equality has become institutionalized in the Greens[4].

What could parties do?

  • Field equal numbers of male and female candidates overall.
  • Ensure that nominations for target wards specifically and target local authority areas more generally are equally distributed between male and female candidates.
  • Where parties are standing more than one candidate in a council ward, these should be gender-balanced tickets.
  • If parties distributing literature suggesting how voters should rank candidates (as the SNP is doing in some local authority areas), parties could suggest that voters rank female candidates first on their ballots.

However, the reluctance of the major parties to make equality guarantees and wider trends of slippage in women’s representation over time raise the question as to whether women’s representation is too important to be left up to political parties. Has the time come to consider statutory quotas, by which we mean legislation which requires parties to take positive action on women’s representation, following the example of countries like Spain, Belgium, France, and even the Republic of Ireland, which is currently drawing up electoral quota legislation?

Why does women’s representation matter? It is widely accepted that men and women should play an equal role in political decision-making to ensure legitimacy, representativeness and quality. We need local councils that look like their communities and that also draw upon ‘all talents’. How can we afford for it to be otherwise? Indeed, recent media coverage has begun to talk about the ‘merit’ of women’s representation, for example, highlighting the paucity of talented Labour men at Holyrood[5].

Whilst the link between women’s political presence and the promotion of women-friendly policies is far from straightforward, nonetheless, there is considerable evidence to suggest that women politicians ‘make a difference’, or, more accurately, that more gender-balanced parliaments and councils do. What is at stake? In times of austerity and welfare state retrenchment, it is crucial that women’s voices and perspectives (in all their diversity) are included in the process. This is especially the case at the local level, where difficult decisions are made and cuts will hit hardest.  Evidence suggests it is harder for progressive policies, such as action to tackle domestic violence, to rise up the political agenda in male-dominated local government than, for example, in the more gender-equal Scottish Parliament. Whilst the Scottish Parliament’s innovative domestic violence strategy has been widely lauded, it stands or falls at local level where it is implemented on a daily basis. Worryingly, recent data from Scottish Women’s Aid reports that, in real terms, 61% of refuge groups have experienced a reduction in the level of funding received from their local authority[6] (2009-2010).

The May 3 elections will almost certainly bring ‘more of the same’ to Scottish local government. But, it should serve as a wake-up call to politicians, activists and voters alike that something has to change, and soon.

[1] We borrow this expression from Professor James Mitchell’s (University of Strathclyde) observation of the membership of the SNP.

[4] Correspondence with Scottish Green Party Elections and Campaigns Committee.

[5] Kevin McKenna ‘If only Holyrood appreciated women’, The Observer, 8 April 2012:

[6] Scottish Women’s Aid (2010):’s%20Aid%20services%20report.pdf

Table 1: Male and Female Candidates by Local Authority


# Local Authority Women Candidates Male Candidates Total Candidates Percentage Women 
1 Aberdeen City 29 83 112 25.9%
2 Aberdeenshire 39 90 129 30.2%
3 Angus 17 33 50 34.0%
4 Argyll and Bute 17 61 78 21.8%
5 Clackmannanshire 11 19 30 36.7%
6 Dumfries and Galloway 16 66 82 19.5%
7 Dundee City 12 50 62 19.4%
8 East Ayrshire 12 39 51 23.5%
9 East Dunbartonshire 12 33 45 26.7%
10 East Lothian 8 36 44 18.2%
11 East Renfrewshire 8 32 40 20.0%
12 City of Edinburgh 30 97 127 23.6%
13 Falkirk 11 42 53 20.8%
14 Fife 46 116 162 28.4%
15 Glasgow 53 172 225 23.5%
16 Highland 40 130 170 23.5%
17 Inverclyde 1 37 38 2.6%
18 Midlothian 9 32 41 21.9%
19 Moray 14 33 47 29.8%
20 Na h-Eileanan Siar 5 58 63 7.9%
21 North Ayrshire 17 52 69 24.6%
22 North Lanarkshire 22 104 126 17.5%
23 Orkney 8 38 46 17.4%
24 Perth and Kinross 21 57 78 26.9%
25 Renfrewshire 18 62 80 22.5%
26 Scottish Borders 16 56 72 22.2%
27 Shetland 5 38 43 11.6%
28 South Ayrshire 14 30 44 31.8%
29 South Lanarkshire 35 103 138 25.4%
30 Stirling 9 36 45 20%
31 West Dunbartonshire 12 33 45 26.7%
32 West Lothian 17 45 62 27.4%
  TOTAL 584 1913 2497 23.4%




Table 2: Male and Female Candidates by Party


Party Female Candidates Male Candidates Total Candidates Percentage Women(Percentage Women 2007)
Labour 136 361 497 27.4%(20.3%)
SNP 147 467 614 23.9%(22.0%)
Liberal Democrats 69 178 247 27.9%(31.4%)
Conservatives 94 268 362 25.9%(25.3%)
Green 35 51 86 40.7%(39.0%)
Independent/Other 103 588 691 14.9%(N/A)*
Total 584 1913 2497 23.4%(22.8%)

*2007 figures are taken from Bochel and Denver (2007) who disaggregate Independents and Others.

About genderpol

The blog of the Gender Politics Research Group, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh - and friends
This entry was posted in Women and Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

34 Responses to More of the Same? Women and the Scottish Local Government Elections 2012

  1. muteswann says:

    Reblogged this on muteswann and commented:
    Having looked through the gender balance of local election candidates in Scotland, I am thankful to Gender Politics at Edinburgh for blogging what I was too downhearted to confront:

  2. Betsy Super says:

    Thanks for making your very clear results so accessible. It’s amazing when you see all the data to realize how much of the gains achieved has come from party politics, and how fragile those gains can be. So here’s a question for the researchers – you point towards the need for legislative action as a potential remedy. I assume for Scotland. What about the rest of the world? Would that work outside of Europe too, or is it a European phenomenon?

    thanks again!

  3. marlowe says:

    indeed a sad state of affairs, but glad that this is being highlighted by drs kenny and mackay. lets hope that the scottish local government adminstration, electorate and civil society acknowledges this research as an indictment on the current system and a call to arms to do something about it!

  4. Pingback: Male, pale and stale: Scottish council elections will fail women, say academics | Old News

  5. Sissy Kenny says:

    Thanks for keeping this issue out in the open and supporting it with data that’s hard to dispute.

  6. Hils says:

    Reblogged this on The Effie and commented:
    male pale and stale? food for thought in the election run-up!

  7. Pingback: More of the Same? Women and the Scottish Local Government Elections 2012 | The Centre for the Study of British Politics and Public Life

  8. Pingback: An end to male, pale and stale? Scottish parties promise action on equality | Old News

  9. Nina Baker says:

    I was one of two female Green councillors elected in Glasgow in 2007 (in a group totalling 5). I have represented the Anderston / City ward for the past 5 years and at this election find that I will be the ONLY FEMALE CANDIDATE IN MY WARD!!
    So the other parties have indeed taken a step back since 2007, as there were other female candidates in my ward then.
    While I would never deny that some men can and do do a fair job for feminism, I would encourage everyone to give their first vote to a woman candidate if they can.

  10. edinburghpir says:

    Reblogged this on Edinburgh Politics and IR Blog and commented:
    Meryl Kenny and Fiona Mackay have completed an analysis of the candidate numbers for the upcoming Scottish local government elections. Less than 1:4 candidates are female; 1:7 contests are male-only; all the major parties are fielding less than 30% female candidates. They argue that the time has come for tough action on women’s representation – or nothing will change anytime soon. See the full information on the new gender politics @ edinburgh blog:

  11. Pingback: More of the Same? Women and the Scottish Local Government Elections 2012 « Women and Politics Specialist Group

  12. Pingback: Scottish parties promise action on equality after report by Kenny and Mackay | Gender Politics at Edinburgh

  13. Pingback: The Week Outside Westminster – Nukes, NATO, “pretty vile” Welsh Tories and Stormont | Left Foot Forward

  14. nina says:

    Thanks for putting out the stats which back up what I feared. Would be interesting to know how many women are in winnable seats and equally how much campaigning and organising is being supported by the party machine in the seats that women are standing in. I suspect the male seats have the lions share of resources.

    • genderpol says:

      You’re right, Nina – the devil is in the detail: we need to know about the distribution of winnable seats and also how wards are carved up for campaigning and so on. We would be very interested to hear from female candidates from all parties about how selection and campaigning under STV is working out in practice.

  15. Pingback: Less than 1 in 4 candidates in local elections is female

  16. Pingback: Council hopeful calls for more women in local politics | Gender Politics at Edinburgh

  17. No discrimination says:

    Dearie me. Women have the same opportunity as men to stand yet don’t want to it seems. Actually passing legislation to artifically alter the situation is n is stupidity.

    Have these researchers ever heard of preference theory

  18. Pingback: New Media Coverage | Gender Politics at Edinburgh

  19. Pingback: Male, Pale, and Stale | Edinburgh Eye

  20. Pingback: Local Government Campaign – Ross-shire Women's Aid

  21. Pingback: An end to male, pale and stale? Scottish parties promise action on equality | Property Cloud | PropertyCloud

  22. Pingback: …but is it Good News for Women? | Gender Politics at Edinburgh

  23. Pingback: …but is it Good News for Women? | The Centre for the Study of British Politics and Public Life

  24. casino says:

    It’s actually a great and useful piece of information. I am satisfied that you just shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.

  25. Pingback: Male, pale and stale: Scottish council elections will fail women, say academics - Government Tenders, Government News and Information - Government Online

  26. Pingback: Still Counting? Women and the 2012 Local Government Elections | Gender Politics at Edinburgh

  27. Pingback: Women, gender equality and constitutional change: lessons from Catalonia and Scotland | Gender Politics at Edinburgh

  28. Pingback: Genderpol at One: Some highlights from our archives | Gender Politics at Edinburgh

  29. Pingback: Undecided Leith | Edinburgh Eye

  30. Pingback: Gender and the Independence Referendum, #GE2015, Brexit, and beyond | Gender Politics at Edinburgh

  31. Pingback: Yes, There’s Still a Local Government Election Going On | Gender Politics at Edinburgh

  32. Pingback: Here We, Here We, Here We … Go (Again): Women and the 2017 Local Government Elections | Gender Politics at Edinburgh

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s